Does the evidence
warrant the action?
Evaluate whether evidence and represented authority warrant a requested action. Detect unsupported inference, qualifier stripping, erased unknowns, broken provenance, and exceeded decision boundaries.
One evaluation. 1 USDC. Base mainnet.
No account. No subscription. No sales conversation. An x402-enabled agent with sufficient spending authority can pay and continue automatically.
POST https://decision-integrity-service.wheelerhubbell.chatgpt.site/evaluate
Four states. Nothing quietly erased.
AUTHORIZED BOUNDED AWAITING_AUTHORITY DENIED
Receive preserved reasons, unknowns, qualifiers, provenance, decision boundaries, the complete submitted record, and a signed attestation binding the evaluation to its settlement receipt.
Only a verified, settled payment releases an evaluation. Fake headers, malformed payments, verification failures and settlement failures do not.
Before a conclusion becomes an action.
Does this evidence warrant this conclusion?
Is this action authorized?
Do I have sufficient warrant to act?
Are unknowns being erased?
Are qualifiers being stripped?
Is this inference warranted?
Does provenance support this recommendation?
Does the requested action exceed represented authority?
One service. Many doors.
When the verification route became the verdict.
A diagnostic autopsy from the development of Decision Integrity: the agent audits its own unsupported conclusions after Wheeler Hubbell calls for a review.
Read the case study — Before Certainty and Coherent Substitution
The boundary is part of the result.
This is a deterministic audit of a structured evidence-and-authority record. It does not independently establish external factual truth, authenticate a represented issuer, or execute the requested action. Payment purchases an evaluation, not an AUTHORIZED outcome.